Prof. J.P.N. Mishra
The QT and QS2 ratio of control group of subjects has shown an insignificant increasing trend for the 1st follow-up period and decreasing trend for the 2nd follow-up period (0.43 ± 0.08 sec. at 0 day, 0.43±0.07 sec. at 90 days and 0.44 ± 0.09 sec. at 180 days). However, in experimental group of subjects a regular and significant decline in the mean values of QT and QS2 ratio was observed. On 0 day the mean value was 0.52 ±.08 sec. and at the end of 90 and 180 days the mean values were reported to be 0.46 ± 0.01 sec. and 0.42 ± 0.07 sec. respectively. The such changes in the QT and QS2 ratio values of experimental group of subjects were statistically significant only at 0-180 days (Table E 28) and appreciable but statistically insignificant at 0-90 and 90-180 days as shown in Table E 27 in E 29.
Table E 27: QT/QS2 at 0 day and 90 days follow-up duration.
| Group | Duration | Mean (sec.) | SD | SE | 'A' |
| Control | 0 day | 0.43 | 0.08 | 0.01 | 5.31NS |
| 90 days | 0.43 | 0.07 | 0.01 | ||
| Experimental | 0 day | 0.52 | 0.08 | 0.01 | 0.1*** |
| 90 days | 0.46 | 0.08 | 0.01 |
Table E 28: QT/QS2 at 0 day and after 180 days follow-up duration
| Group | Duration | Mean (sec.) | SD | SE | 'A' |
| Control (n=30) | 0 day | 0.43 | 0.08 | 0.01 | 1.28NS |
| 180 days | 0.44 | 0.09 | 0.01 | ||
| Experimental (n=30) | 0 day | 0.52 | 0.08 | 0.01 | 0.04*** |
| 180 days | 0.42 | 0.07 | 0.01 |
