Friday, April 18, 2008
Today, economic policy is designed to help us achieve a new global order with optimum economic configurations. Violence has bred stress and strain, seriously endangering world peace. With increasing demands, our problems have only multiplied. Does this mean that an economic system which gives rise to these tendencies is necessarily flawed?
Post-industrial revolution, developed nations acquired dominant control over world resources. But industrial pollution began to threaten the environment. Powerful nations became more of a threat than sources of strength, as they had their eyes on economic empire-building.
Mahavira said, the one who rejects the people and the world, rejects his own existence; and the one who rejects his own existence rejects the existence of the world.
He said: "Do not reject the existence of the world and do not reject your existence as well. The most important principle of environment is that you are not the only element. When you do something for yourself you must know your actions will impact the entire world."
Mahavira observes from the perspective of anekanta that when a finger makes a movement, the entire world vibrates. All inter-linked atoms are activated. This concept of all life and matter being inter-linked has been explained by Jain acharyas: "We are not alone.
The principle of anekanta symbolises the fact that no element is either different or same as the total. It is both separate and integrated. We are undeniably connected - that is why we lead both dependent and independent lives".
The second parameter of Mahavira's economic policy is non-violence. Ancient scholars have said: Jeeven jeevasya jeevanam - Life is the basic element of any living being. Mahavira said that unnecessary and aggressive violence should be discouraged - even the smallest of the small creatures deserve to be protected from violent acts.
Ved Vyas wrote in the Mahabharata that nobody is superior to man. Mahavira also said that.
That might be so, but it is also true that nobody is more irrational than man. Mentally and physically, human beings are highly evolved - man's consciousness and wisdom is superior to any other living creatures. But even this is only a partial truth. It is presumed that man can do almost anything.
He can kill animals and birds and does so on a large scale. Would he still qualify as a superior creature?
The superiority complex has, in fact, misled him so much that he has become uncontrollable.
Erictron observed: We should understand that mere material is no defence. When the feeling of non-protection is realised, a basic change will take place. With this, global policy based on national ego and the concept of national sovereignty would diminish and a balance would emerge necessary to satisfy the escalating demands of a growing population.