Crumbling Ecosystem and Humanity
Though ahimsa, the basic tenent of Jainism, has been in vogue since the Age of Lord Rsabhadeva, the First Jain Tirthankar (Jina or path finder) of this cycle of time, who it is believed, was born thousands of years ago, it shot into prominence with the advent of Gandhi in the twentieth century who used it successfully as a weapon to compel the Britishers to quit India and give her freedom ultimately.
The crumbling ecosystem of the planet earth and its rapid environmental degradation have once again attracted the attention of the concerned citizens all over the world recently towards the nonviolent Jain tradition and its principle of ahimsa. I would define, analyze and elucidate the Jain principle of ahimsa vis-a-vis the present crisis that threatens the extinction of life in the foregoing paragraphs but it will be in fitness of things if I first give my own perception and assessment of the precarious situation precipitated by man's callous attitude and cruelty towards nature and his unrestrained lifestyle rooted in sheer pomposity, ugly exhibitionism and in his desire to monopolize all resources of the planet and use them for amassing wealth and make his life most comfortable This human tendency is responsible for this unprecedented scientific, industrial and technological advancement which may have brought prosperity to a few people but have pushed billions of people to near starvation and abject conditions following the destruction of nature which sustains all life forms. It has also resulted in the wiping out of many species of life vitally important for human survival. Civilizations evolved in similar technological stages do seek to improve well-being, they often bring an illusory sense of power and separation from nature and erode basic values that encoded sustainable practice. Moreover the oldest styles of human culture are still with us like nomadic pastoralist and peasant farmer who persist alongside the megacities of modern life. Though great civilizations have repeatedly failed, these simple technologies survive. 'Only' when war, famine and environmental collapse strike, do we understand, too late, our dependence on nature and on peace - the ecological imperative. According to James Lovelock, the celebrated scientist, who thinks that planet earth is gravely ill regards the planetary life as a whole self-regulating organism living amid the web of interdependent species and the traces of past lives. We cannot conquer nature without defeating ourselves Recognition of this truth is fundamental to survival of life on this planet James Lovelock has named this entity of self-regulating organism Gaia after the ancient Greek Goddess of the Earth. Another eminent scientist of the modern age Fritjof Capra says in his recent book - THE TURNING POINT:
We have lost touch with our biological and ecological base more than any other civilization in the past. This separation manifests itself in a striking disparity between the development of intellectual power, scientific knowledge and technological skills, on the one hand, and of wisdom, spirituality and ethics on the other hand.
These views of the modern scientist have only substantiated what Lord Mahavira had stated two thousand five hundred years ago "Parasparapagraho Jivanam which means all life is bound together by mutual support and interdependence. According to me it is the greatest ecological statement ever made by any ancient seer.
The Jain principle of ahimsa is an ecological ethic Though equally important are the other four principles of Jainism viz non-stealing, truth, aparigrah (non-possession) and brahmcharya (abstinence from sexual lust) they are more or less there to strengthen the principle of ahimsa only.
Ahimsa is the highest point of the development of human civilization and culture. Himsa (violence) is inextricably intertwined with human life but it is not considered a part of its development. More and more people in the world now realize the importance of ahimsa for human survival in the wake of the two nuclear holocausts that took the toll of two million lives in the fifties of this century and the phenomenal rise of violence in the form of ethnic, religious and political wars and conflicts dotting the length and breadth of the globe today. Humanity seems to be heading fast for disaster as we see it plunged into chaos and anarchy.
Violence: Definition and Causes
Before we analyze the causes of violence let us first try to understand as to what we actually mean by violence. Examples of physical violence need not be explained as they are universally known forms of violence since these examples describe just one aspect of violence. The noted Jain scholar Umasvati has defined violence in Tattvarth Sutra in the following words:
Pramattayogat pranavyaparopanam himsa'
(Taking life away out of passion is violence)
Passion includes the powerful emotions of anger, pride, deceipt and greed or we can say that an injury to life motivated by passion is violence. If an injury is caused out of passion without deliberate intention, it does not of itself constitute an evil act since it is not accompanied by any feeling of attachment or hatred. As social beings we cannot escape violence in its totality so the Jain scriptures advise the shravaks or votaries to at least refrain from unnecessary violence and follow ANUVRAT (basic vows). The acts of violence that we see in society today are being committed out of intense feelings of hatred, possessiveness, jealousy, carnality. Violence first arises in thought and is poured out verbally i.e. in words. When the passion grows uncontrollable, it leads to ghastly physical violence. Hence whether it is the unrestrained use of water, air, plants, vegetables or the unrestrained destruction of forests to satisfy one's limitless greed, the origin is the mind of man. Deeply concerned about the tide of violence closing in on humankind, Robert Muller - the former Assistant Secretary General UNO and the Chancellor Emeritus of the University for Peace Costa Rica suggested that a commission consisting of Heads of State should be appointed by UN to deal with all forms of violence in the world today: physical violence, verbal, visual and mental violence. It should deal with violence against children, in families, in communities, in the streets, among religions, in international relations, among all groups of this planet including violence against our brothers and sisters, animals and violence which prevail at this moment in the world. Acharya Mahapragya, a noted Jain thinker and head of Swetamber Terapanth Jain sect says:
Both violence and nonviolence inhere in us. Our mind also works In two ways: one dictates anger; the other counsels patience, puts the brakes on anger. Both the instigating and the restraining tendencies are there. Good and evil are both present in us. The real question is which of the two we shall develop. Which one shall we awaken and which one shall we put to sleep?
He further opines that the violence prevalent in society cannot be put an end to without developing spiritual nonviolence. It is based on the unity and equality of all souls -souls of all sentient beings on this globe.
Ahimsa (nonviolence) in Various Faiths
All religious traditions of the world agree that ahimsa alone can be the basis of our survival. In Dhammapada, a Buddhist sacred text, it is stated,
Ahimska ye munayo nichham koyen sanvuta: te yanti achutam thanam yatth gantva na sochre
(He who lives a life of self-restraint rooted in ahimsa attains to the state of immortality. After achieving it he will never experience sorrow)
The Vedic culture begins with the life of actions and enjoyment and proceeds towards the life of austerity and renunciation but the shramanic culture originates in renunciation from the very beginning. In Manusmriti, written by Manu - the celebrated personage regarded as the representative man and father of human race, we come across many slokas (verses) which confirm the principle of complete nonviolence for living the good life. At one place it is stated
Indriyanam nirodhen ragdweshkshayen cha ahimsaya cha bhutanammrittvaya kalpate
(By controlling sensual desires, renunciation of attachment and enmity and observance of ahimsa, a sanyasi (ascetic) attains liberation (moksha)).
Thus even Vedic and Upnishadic culture emphasizes the observance of ahimsa in our life In Mahabharata it is said Ahimsa sakalo dharmo himsa dharmst thahitah (Ahimsa is in itself a complete religion and himsa (violence) is a great sin)
The Persian holy scripture AVESTA (JUDAISM) lays down three kinds of duties for human beings:
(I) to turn our foe into a friend
(ii) to change a wicked person into a righteous human being
(iii) to change an ignorant man into a knowledgeable and learned person.
Treating a foe like a friend depends entirely on the principle of ahimsa. In the Old Testament we come across. Ten Commandments which express the ideal of man's duty to God and his neighbour by which Moses organized and led the Israelites into nationhood and are the basic tenets of the Jewish religion. Christians accept the Decalogue, together with Christ's example and teaching, as the basis of their morality. The sixth commandment says 'Do not kill anyone' These commandments also forbid adultery, stealing and lust.
Jesus said
"Ye have heard that it was said, "an eye for an eve and a tooth for a tooth", but I say unto you, resist not him that is evil but whosoever smiteth thee on they right cheek turn to him the other also. And if any man would go to law with thee and take away thy coat, let him have thy cloak also (Matt. 5:39-40). Jesus said, "Love your enemies - pray for your prosecutors, so that you may show yourself true sons of your Father in Heaven, for He makes His sun rise on bad and good alike and makes the rain fall on both upright and wrong doers, for If you love only those who love you, what is there remarkable in that?"
In the Christian tradition love is synonymous with God or what we call ahimsa The concept of nonviolence differs in its observance in various traditions. Some go to an extreme length while others adopt a middle course in solving day-to-day problems, keeping in mind the spirit of equality, brotherhood, love and purity of character The Islamic view of nonviolence differs in that it gives full consideration to human weakness. The Holy Quran says:
We ordained
For the children of IsraelThat if anyone slew
A person - unless it be
for murder of for spreading
Mischief in the land -
It would be as ifHe slew the whole people
And if anyone saved
a life,
It would be as if he
saved the life of the whole
people (5:35)
The teachings of LaoTse and Confucious emphasize austerity and simplicity in life. LaoTse exhorts his followers to heal the wounds of violence by love and compassion. Confucious asks his followers to exercise restraint in their behaviour. He says Cause the flood of love in the stream of life and disseminate the message of friendship.
Gandhi and Ahimsa
Gandhi's legacy of ahimsa has created a deep impact on the world. He demonstrated to us the immense power of ahimsa by using it as an effective weapon to achieve independence for India without shedding blood. He was deeply influenced by the Jain scholar Raichandbhai. Gandhi has written, For me there Is no religion other than the religion of truth, no duty other than ahimsa. Ahimsa is the greatest religion for me. I can say with assurance, as a result of my experiments, that a perfect vision ofttyth can follow a complete- realization of ahimsa.
Gandhi lived ahimsa in his life. According to him violence is bred by inequality, nonviolence by equality. I quote Gandhi's own words again to illucidate his concept of nonviolence
Identification with everything that lives is impossible without self-purification; without self-purification the observance of the law of Ahimsa must remain an empty dream. But the path of self-purification is hard and steep. To attain to perfect purity one has to become absolutely pass/on-free in thought, speech and action; to rise above the opposing currents of love and hatred, attachment and repulsion.
The Jain Principle of Ahimsa
Jainism is one of the most ancient of Indian religious traditions. It is also the oldest non-Vedic school of thought. The word 'Jaina' is taken from 'Jina which means conquerors or victors. Those who destroy all the bad karmas through austerities, penance and practise and observe the vow of ahimsa (nonviolence) in its totality i.e. do not react to any form of provocation or physical injury inflicted upon them in word, thoughts and in their actions become arhats Jaina are the followers of Jinas - the twenty four Tirthankars. The first Tirthankar was Lord RISHABH and the last Tirthankar was Lord Mahavira (500 years BC). The Jain view of nonviolence enjoins its followers to refrain from indulging in violence in thought, word and action. It believes in the equality of all living beings and in the state of equanimity. Ahimsa results from the equanimous state of mind. Ahimsa in the Jinist tradition means reverence for all forms of life and avoidance of violence in thought, word and deed. A Jain ascetic observes ahimsa in its totality himself. He doesn't encourage others to resort to violence in thought, word and deed nor does he endorse it in thought, word and deed. In Acarang Sutra ahimsa has been proclaimed in the following words:
Injurious activities inspired by self-interest lead to evil and darkness. This is what is called bondage, delusion, death, and hell. To do harm to others is to do harm to oneself. "Thou art he whom thou intendest to kill I Thou art he whom thou intendest to tyrranize over I" We corrupt ourselves as soon as we intend to corrupt others. We kill ourselves as soon as we intend to kill others. Ahimsa sprouts from a person's inner awakening. It conveys many things simultaneously whereas the word 'nonviolence' only indicates abstinence from physical violence.
The Jain principle of ahimsa cannot be understood in its right perspective unless we have a clear insight into the Jain concepts of jiva-ajiva (animate and inanimate), asarva-bandha (influx and bondage), samvar-nirjara (inhibition of instincts and impulses and total uprooting of instincts and impulses) and moksha (emancipation resulting from samvar and nlrjara Just as the famous four noble truths of Buddhism namely, suffering, cause of suffering, emancipation and the path leading to emancipation admits that if there is suffering in this world, there is the cause of suffering and there is a cure, a way to end this suffering and attain nirvana, similarly the Jains believe that the world is full of suffering and the cause of suffering is himsa (causing injury to jivas (all forms of life) which includes causing actual physical injury to jivas or causing injury through unpleasant and violent words or thoughts. As a result of himsa (violence) in thought, word and deed, there is influx of karmic matter which adds to the misery and suffering of the jivas who indulge in it in the present life and in the life hereafter and causes karmic bondage leading a jiva to be born in different species in accordance with the nature of his crime and criminality and in order to destroy the karmic bondage a jiva has to repent for his himsa by nirjara i.e. austerities, penance and observance of complete nonviolence (ahimsa) and equanimity of mind and by undergoing rigorous forms of self-suffering and ultimately it will attain to moksha (liberation from the cycle of death and birth).
Lord Mahavira has classified iivas (all forms of life on this planet) into six categories. The very discussion on Jain concept of ahimsa is meaningless unless we perceive the most subtle and complex structure of living organisms on this planet. According to him the entire planet is nothing but a mass of living organisms. His theory of jiva is called shadllvnikaya (six forms of life i.e. prathvikaya (earth), apkaya (water), askaya (fire), vayukaya (air), vanaspatikaya (vegetation) and traskaya (mobile living organisms). The other philosophers do not recognize earth water, fire and air as living organisms but according to Mahavira they are. It will be useful to reproduce the dialogue between Lord Mahavira and his disciple Gautam.
Gautam - On being attacked what sort of pain does the earth-body experience?
Mahavira - Gautam! suppose a young and strong man hits an old and feeble person on the head with both his hands, what sort of pain does the old man feel on being hit on the head by both the hands of the young man?
Gautam - O Lord! the old man would feel excruciating pain.
Mahavira - O Gautam! on being attacked the earth-body feels much more pain than that experienced by an old man.
Other religious traditions enjoin their disciples to show compassion towards animals and human beings while some others also agree that vegetation has life and trees and plants feel pain when touched or hit but none of them would believe that the earth or water or air or fire are also living organisms.
Mahavira advises his ascetics to be careful and vigilant and not to cause injury even to earth-bodies, fire-bodies, water-bodies and air-bodies. A jain ascetic is supposed to refrain from indulging in violence towards all six kinds of diverse forms of life on this planet. Mahavira's principle of shadjivanikaya is unique. In a way we can even call it something transcendental. Acharva Sidhsen has written referring to Mahavira, "O venerable one I Your doctrine of shadiivnikaya alone would suffice to establish that you are omniscient. No other proof is required." Truly Mahavira's spiritual perfection and the dawn of ahimsa in him enabled him to attain cosmic vision.
Mahavira's ahimsa is all encompassing and recognizes the right of existende for all jlvas (souls) whether they are earth-bodied or fire-bodied or water-bodied or air-bodied or mobile creatures. All jivas (life forms) are equal. If a house holder finds it impossible to refrain from himsa in its totality for his survival, he should be absolutely clear in his mind that he is doing himsa and should ask for the forgiveness of the jivas being killed for his sustenance.
He devised a separate code of conduct for his votaries based on basic vows (anuvrats) which enjoins on them to practise self-restraint and tolerance. For ascetics the five-fold path consisting of the five great vows (Mahavrats), ahimsa (nonviolence) in thought, word and deed, truth, non-stealing, brahmcharya (the practice of chastity in thought, word and deed) and non-acquisitiveness (aparigrah) is a path of complete renunciation of himsa in any form. While the aim of an ascetic is to attain to liberation (moksha), the aim of a Jain house-holder is to move progressively towards the attainment of liberation. The ecological and environment degradation that has posed a grave threat not only to the existence of humanity which is at the root of the crisis but also to other species of the planet which are facing great difficulties and are almost on the verge of annihilation can be checked even at this state if the scientific community studies the basic principles of Jainism and advises the people; to switch over to the Jain lifestyle rooted in ahimsa. Mahavira says to his disciples, "The Arhats (venerable perfect souls) of the past, those of the present and the Mure narrate, discourse, proclaim and assert that one should not injure, subjugate, enslave, torture or kill any animal, living being, organism or sentient being. The doctrine of ahimsa is immaculate, immutable and eternal." He further said, "Those who resort to and remain engrossed in violence suffer (the miseries of) transmigration again and again."
Thus the Jain principle of ahimsa is based on the theory of shadjivnikaya (six kinds of life forms classified by Mahavira) while elucidating his most subtle, profound and realistic concept of nonviolence most relevant in the present ecological crisis which in a public hearing in Europe has been described in the following words:
The important problems are: environmental deterioration in many regions, Hearing catastrophic proportions; poverty boarding on indigence Tor most of the population: intense social differentiation, hastening the disintegration of society; loss of a system of values, with disorientation of much of population; growing criminality, with no guarantees of safely: disappearance of the country's labour potential.
Mahavira has added a new dimeasion to the concept of ahimsa'Cflllcd ANEKANTVAD (The doctrine that truth is many-sided). Elucidating it in his famous book entitled "The Jain Declaration of Nature" Dr L.M. Singhvi - the former High Commissioner of India in U.K. says:
The concept of universal interdependence underpins the Jain theory of knowledge, known as anckantavada or the doctrine of manifold aspects.
Anekantavada describes the world as a multifaceted, everchanging reality with an infinity of viewpoints depending on the time, place, nature and state of the one who is the viewer and that which is viewed.
This leads to the doctrine of syadvada or relativity, which states that truth is relative to different viewpoints (nayas). What is true from one point of view is open to question from another. Absolute truth cannot be grasped from any particular viewpoint alone because absolute truth is the sum total of all the different viewpoints that make up the universe. Because it is rooted in the doctrines of anckantavada and syadvada, Jamism does not look upon the universe from an anthropocentric, ethnocentric or egocentric viewpoint. It takes into account the viewpoints of other species, other communities and nations and other human beings.
I sum up my paper by quoting Mahavira's most famous ecological statement PAKASPAROPMiRABO JTVANAM (ail life on this planet is bound together by mutual support;ind interdependence). While people like James Lovelock who are still researching the complex self-rcgulaling system of'life on this planet and are womed and awe-struck as facts reveal themselves Ma'havira had unfolded it before his disciples 2500 years ago. Lord Mahavira has also predicted that on account of humanity's abnormal and unethical behaviour, this system will further crumble in the six era and life would be wiped out and the planet's climate would be so hot that a few human beings still left alive would remain hidden in the caves near Himalayas in the day and would live on fish.
Let us listen to his warning and do something to arrest this deteriorating trend to save the planet by adopting the nonviolent way of living.