Ganadhar Sudharma Swami
Thirty-Second Lecture: The Causes of Carelessness
With attentive mind hear me explain for your benefit the deliverance from the beginning less time, together with its causes,[1] and from all misery: a truly wholesome subject. (1)
By the teaching of true[2] knowledge, by the avoidance of ignorance and delusion, and by the destruction of love and hatred, one arrives at final deliverance which is nothing but bliss. (2)
This is the road to it: to serve the Gurus and the old (teachers), to avoid throughout foolish people, to apply oneself earnestly to study, and to ponder zealously on the meaning of the Sūtras. (3)
A Śramaṇa engaged in austerities, who longs for righteousness,[3] should eat the proper quantity of allowed food, should select a companion of right understanding, and should live in a place suited to seclusion. (4)
If he does not meet with a clever companion who surpasses or equals him in virtue, he should live by himself, abstaining from sins and not devoted to pleasures. (5)
As the crane[4] is produced from an egg, and the egg is produced from a crane, so they call desire[5] the origin of delusion, and delusion the origin of desire. (6)
Love and hatred are caused by Karman, and they say that Karman has its origin in delusion; Karman is the root of birth and death, and birth and death they call misery. (7)
Misery ceases on the absence of delusion, delusion ceases on the absence of desire, desire ceases on the absence of greed, greed ceases on the absence of property. (8)
I shall explain in due order the means which must be adopted by him who wants to thoroughly uproot love, hatred, and delusion. (9)
Pleasant food[6] should not be enjoyed with preference, for it generally makes men over-strong;[7] and desires rush upon the strong, like birds upon a tree with sweet fruits. (10)
As in a forest, full of fuel, a fire fanned by the wind cannot be extinguished, so the fire (as it were) of the senses of him who eats as he lists; it does not benefit any chaste man. (11)
The mind of those who always live in unfrequented lodgings, who eat low food, and who subdue their senses, will not be attacked by the foe, Love, who is vanquished as disease is by medicine. (12)
As it is not safe for mice to live near the dwelling of a cat, so a chaste (monk) cannot stay in a house inhabited by women. (13)
A Śramaṇa, engaged in penance, should not allow himself to watch the shape, beauty, coquetry, laughter, prattle, gestures, and glances of women, nor retain a recollection of them in his mind. (14)
Not to look at, nor to long for, not to think of, nor to praise, womankind: this is becoming the meditation of the noble ones, and it is always wholesome to those who delight in chastity. (15)
Though those who possess the three Guptis, cannot be disturbed even by well-adorned goddesses, still it is recommended to monks to live by themselves, as this is wholesome in every way. (16)
To a man who longs for liberation, who is afraid of the Saṃsāra, and lives according to the Law, nothing in the world offers so many difficulties[8] as women who delight the mind of the ignorant. (17)
To those who have overcome the attachment (to women), all others will offer no difficulties;[9] even as to those who have crossed the great ocean, no river, though big like the Ganges, (will offer any difficulty). (18)
From desire of pleasure arises the misery of the whole world, the gods included; whatever misery of body and mind there is, the dispassionate will put an end to it. (19)
As the fruit of the Kimpāka[10] is beautiful in taste and colour, when eaten; but destroys the life when digested, (being) poison; similar in their effect are pleasures. (20)
A Śramaṇa, engaged in austerities, who longs for righteousness,[11] should not fix his thoughts on the pleasant objects of the senses, nor turn his mind from them, if they be unpleasant. (21)
"Colour" attracts the eye; it is the pleasant cause of Love, but the unpleasant cause of Hatred;[12] he who is indifferent to them (viz. colours), is called dispassionate. (22)
The eye perceives "colour," and "colour" attracts the eye; the cause of Love is pleasant, and the cause of Hatred is unpleasant. (23)
He who is passionately fond of "colours," will come to untimely ruin; just as an impassioned moth which is attracted by the light rushes into death. (24)
He who passionately hates (a colour), will at the same moment suffer pain. It is the fault of an undisciplined man that he is annoyed (by a colour); it is not the "colour" itself that annoys him. (25)
He who is very fond of a lovely "colour," hates all others; hence a fool will suffer misery, but a dispassionate sage is not affected by it. (26)
He who has a passion for "colours,"[13] will kill many movable and immovable beings; a passionate fool, intent on his personal interest, pains and torments those beings in many ways. (27)
How can a man who passionately desires "colours,"[14] be happy while he gets, keeps, uses, loses, and misses (those things). Even when he enjoys them, he is never satisfied. (28)
When he is not satisfied with those "colours," and his craving for them grows stronger and stronger, he will become discontented, and unhappy by dint of his discontent; misled by greed he will take another's property. (29)
When he is overcome by violent desire, takes another's property, and is not satisfied with those "colours" and their possession, then his deceit and falsehood increase on account of his greed; yet he will not get rid of his misery. (30)
After and before he has lied,[15] and when he is on the point of lying, he feels infinitely unhappy. Thus when he takes another's property, and is (after all) not satisfied by the "colours" (he has obtained), he becomes unhappy, and nobody will protect him.[16] (31)
How, then, can a man who is devoted to "colours," ever derive any happiness from anything? He suffers pain at the time of their enjoyment to procure which he had suffered misery. (32)
In the same way he who hates "colours," incurs a long succession of pains; when his mind is filled with hatred, he accumulates Karman which in the end again produces misery. (33)
But a man who is indifferent to "colours," is free from sorrows; though still in the Saṃsāra, he is not affected by that long succession of pains, just as the leaf of the Lotus (is not moistened) by water. (34)
"Sound" attracts the ear; it is the pleasant cause of Love, but the unpleasant cause of Hatred; he who is indifferent to them (viz. sounds), is called dispassionate. (35)
The ear perceives "sound," and "sound" attracts the ear; the cause of Love is pleasant, and the cause of Hatred is unpleasant. (36)
He who is passionately fond of "sounds," will come to untimely ruin; just as an impassioned deer allured (by a song) rushes into death, without being satisfied with the sound. (37)
He who passionately hates (a sound), will at the same moment suffer pain. It is the fault of an undisciplined man that he is annoyed (by a sound); it is not the "sound" itself that annoys him. (38)
He who is very fond of a lovely "sound," hates all others; hence a fool will suffer misery, but a dispassionate sage is not affected by it. (39)
He who has a passion for "sounds," will kill many movable and immovable beings; a passionate fool, intent on his personal interest, pains and torments those beings in many ways. (40)
How can a man who passionately desires "sounds," be happy while he gets, keeps, uses, loses, and misses (those things). Even when he enjoys them, he is never satisfied. (41)
When he is not satisfied with those "sounds," and his craving for them grows stronger and stronger, he will become discontented, and unhappy by dint of his discontent; misled by greed he will take another's property. (42)
When he is overcome by violent desire, takes another's property, and is not satisfied with those "sounds" and their possession, then his deceit and falsehood increase on account of his greed; yet he will not get rid of his misery. (43)
After and before he has lied, and when he is on the point of lying, he feels infinitely unhappy. Thus when he takes another's property, and is (after all) not satisfied by the "sounds" (he has obtained), he becomes unhappy, and nobody will protect him. (44)
How, then, can a man who is devoted to "sounds," ever derive any happiness from anything? He suffers pain at the time of their enjoyment to procure which he had suffered misery. (45)
In the same way he who hates "sounds," incurs a long succession of pains; when his mind is filled with hatred, he accumulates Karman which in the end again produces misery. (46)
But a man who is indifferent to "sounds," is free from sorrows; though still in the Saṃsāra, he is not affected by that long succession of pains, just as the leaf of the Lotus (is not moistened) by water. (47)
"Smell" attracts the nose; it is the pleasant cause of Love, but the unpleasant cause of Hatred; he who is indifferent to them (viz. smells), is called dispassionate. (48)
The nose perceives "smell," and "smell" attracts the nose; the cause of Love is pleasant, and the cause of Hatred is unpleasant. (49)
He who is passionately fond of "smells," will come to untimely ruin; as an impassioned snake which is allured by the smell of a drug, when it comes out of its hole. (50)
He who passionately hates (a smell), will at the same moment suffer pain. It is the fault of an undisciplined man that he is annoyed (by a smell); it is not the "smell" itself that annoys him. (51)
He who is very fond of a lovely "smell," hates all others; hence a fool will suffer misery, but a dispassionate sage is not affected by it. (52)
He who has a passion for "smells," will kill many movable and immovable beings; a passionate fool, intent on his personal interest, pains and torments those beings in many ways. (53)
How can a man who passionately desires "smells," be happy while he gets, keeps, uses, loses, and misses (those things). Even when he enjoys them, he is never satisfied. (54)
When he is not satisfied with those "smells," and his craving for them grows stronger and stronger, he will become discontented, and unhappy by dint of his discontent; misled by greed he will take another's property. (55)
When he is overcome by violent desire, takes another's property, and is not satisfied with those "smells" and their possession, then his deceit and falsehood increase on account of his greed; yet he will not get rid of his misery. (56)
After and before he has lied, and when he is on the point of lying, he feels infinitely unhappy. Thus when he takes another's property, and is (after all) not satisfied by the "smells" (he has obtained), he becomes unhappy, and nobody will protect him. (57)
How, then, can a man who is devoted to "smells," ever derive any happiness from anything? He suffers pain at the time of their enjoyment to procure which he had suffered misery. (58)
In the same way he who hates "smells," incurs a long succession of pains; when his mind is filled with hatred, he accumulates Karman which in the end again produces misery. (59)
But a man who is indifferent to "smells," is free from sorrows; though still in the Saṃsāra, he is not affected by that long succession of pains, just as the leaf of the Lotus (is not moistened) by water. (60)
"Taste" attracts the tongue; it is the pleasant cause of Love, but the unpleasant cause of Hatred; he who is indifferent to them (viz. tastes), is called dispassionate. (61)
The tongue perceives "taste," and "taste" attracts the tongue; the cause of Love is pleasant, and the cause of Hatred is unpleasant. (62)
He who is passionately fond of "tastes," will come to untimely ruin; just as an impassioned fish which is eager to swallow the bait, has its body transfixed by a hook. (63)
He who passionately hates (a taste), will at the same moment suffer pain. It is the fault of an undisciplined man that he is annoyed (by a taste); it is not the "taste" itself that annoys him. (64)
He who is very fond of a lovely "taste," hates all others; hence a fool will suffer misery, but a dispassionate sage is not affected by it. (65)
He who has a passion for "tastes," will kill many movable and immovable beings; a passionate fool, intent on his personal interest, pains and torments those beings in many ways. (66)
How can a man who passionately desires "tastes," be happy while he gets, keeps, uses, loses, and misses (those things). Even when he enjoys them, he is never satisfied. (67)
When he is not satisfied with those "tastes," and his craving for them grows stronger and stronger, he will become discontented, and unhappy by dint of his discontent; misled by greed he will take another's property. (68)
When he is overcome by violent desire, takes another's property, and is not satisfied with those "tastes" and their possession, then his deceit and falsehood increase on account of his greed; yet he will not get rid of his misery. (69)
After and before he has lied, and when he is on the point of lying, he feels infinitely unhappy. Thus when he takes another's property, and is (after all) not satisfied by the "tastes" (he has obtained), he becomes unhappy, and nobody will protect him. (70)
How, then, can a man who is devoted to "tastes," ever derive any happiness from anything? He suffers pain at the time of their enjoyment to procure which he had suffered misery. (71)
In the same way he who hates "tastes," incurs a long succession of pains; when his mind is filled with hatred, he accumulates Karman which in the end again produces misery. (72)
But a man who is indifferent to "tastes," is free from sorrows; though still in the Saṃsāra, he is not affected by that long succession of pains, just as the leaf of the Lotus (is not moistened) by water. (73)
"Touch" attracts the body; it is the pleasant cause of Love, but the unpleasant cause of Hatred; he who is indifferent to them (viz. touches), is called dispassionate. (74)
The body perceives "touch," and "touch" attracts the body; the cause of Love is pleasant, and the cause of Hatred is unpleasant. (75)
He who is passionately fond of "touch," will come to untimely ruin; just as an impassioned buffalo who dives in cold water, is taken hold of by a crocodile and dies. (76)
He who passionately hates (a touch), will at the same moment suffer pain. It is the fault of an undisciplined man that he is annoyed (by a touch); it is not the "touch" itself that annoys him. (77)
He who is very fond of a lovely "touch," hates all others; hence a fool will suffer misery, but a dispassionate sage is not affected by it. (78)
He who has a passion for "touches," will kill many movable and immovable beings; a passionate fool, intent on his personal interest, pains and torments those beings in many ways. (79)
How can a man who passionately desires "touching," be happy while he gets, keeps, uses, loses, and misses (those things). Even when he enjoys them, he is never satisfied. (80)
When he is not satisfied with those "touches," and his craving for them grows stronger and stronger, he will become discontented, and unhappy by dint of his discontent; misled by greed he will take another's property. (81)
When he is overcome by violent desire, takes another's property, and is not satisfied with those "touches" and their possession, then his deceit and falsehood increase on account of his greed; yet he will not get rid of his misery. (82)
After and before he has lied, and when he is on the point of lying, he feels infinitely unhappy. Thus when he takes another's property, and is (after all) not satisfied by the "touches" (he has obtained), he becomes unhappy, and nobody will protect him. (83)
How, then, can a man who is devoted to "touch," ever derive any happiness from anything? He suffers pain at the time of their enjoyment to procure which he had suffered misery. (84)
In the same way he who hates "touch," incurs a long succession of pains; when his mind is filled with hatred, he accumulates Karman which in the end again produces misery. (85)
But a man who is indifferent to "touch," is free from sorrows; though still in the Saṃsāra, he is not affected by that long succession of pains, just as the leaf of the Lotus (is not moistened) by water. (86)
"Feeling" attracts the mind; it is the pleasant cause of Love, but the unpleasant cause of Hatred; he who is indifferent to them (viz. feelings), is called dispassionate. (87)
The mind perceives "feeling," and "feeling" attracts the mind; the cause of Love is pleasant, and the cause of Hatred is unpleasant. (88)
He who is passionately fond of "feelings," will come to untimely ruin; just as an impassioned elephant who is inflamed by carnal desires, is turned from his way by a female elephant (and is captured and at last killed in battle). (89)
He who passionately hates (a feeling), will at the same moment suffer pain. It is the fault of an undisciplined man that he is annoyed (by a feeling); it is not the "feeling" itself that annoys him. (90)
He who is very fond of a lovely "feeling," hates all others; hence a fool will suffer misery, but a dispassionate sage is not affected by it. (91)
He who has a passion for "feelings," will kill many movable and immovable beings; a passionate fool, intent on his personal interest, pains and torments those beings in many ways. (92)
How can a man who passionately desires "feelings," be happy while he gets, keeps, uses, loses, and misses (those things). Even when he enjoys them, he is never satisfied. (93)
When he is not satisfied with those "feelings," and his craving for them grows stronger and stronger, he will become discontented, and unhappy by dint of his discontent; misled by greed he will take another's property. (94)
When he is overcome by violent desire, takes another's property, and is not satisfied with those "feelings" and their possession, then his deceit and falsehood increase on account of his greed; yet he will not get rid of his misery. (95)
After and before he has lied, and when he is on the point of lying, he feels infinitely unhappy. Thus when he takes another's property, and is (after all) not satisfied by the "feelings" (he has obtained), he becomes unhappy, and nobody will protect him. (96)
How, then, can a man who is devoted to "feelings," ever derive any happiness from anything? He suffers pain at the time of their enjoyment to procure which he had suffered misery. (97)
In the same way he who hates "feelings," incurs a long succession of pains; when his mind is filled with hatred, he accumulates Karman which in the end again produces misery. (98)
But a man who is indifferent to "feelings," is free from sorrows; though still in the Saṃsāra, he is not affected by that long succession of pains, just as the leaf of the Lotus (is not moistened) by water. (99)
Thus the objects of the senses and of the mind cause pain to passionate men, but they never in the least cause any pain to the dispassionate. (100)
Pleasant things (by themselves) do not cause indifference nor emotions (as anger, etc.); but by either hating or loving them, a man undergoes such a change through delusion. (101)
Anger, pride, deceit, greed; disgust, aversion to self-control and delight in sensual things;[17] mirth, fear, sorrow, carnal desire for women, men, or both; all these manifold passions arise in him who is attached to pleasures; and so do other emotions produced by those (before mentioned) arise in him who is to be pitied, who (ought to be) ashamed of himself, and who is hateful. (102, 103)
A monk should not desire a companion, not (even) one who is able to perform his religious duties; nor, if he regrets having taken the vows, (should he desire for) a worldly reward of his austerities.[18] Such emotions of an infinite variety arise in one who is the slave of his senses. (104)
Desiring happiness and being submerged in the ocean of delusion, he forms many plans for warding off misery; and for their sake an impassioned man exerts himself. (105)
But all kinds of objects of the senses, sounds, etc., will cause to the indifferent neither a pleasant nor an unpleasant feeling. (106)
He who endeavours to recognise the vanity of all desires,[19] will arrive at perfect indifference. When he ceases to desire the objects (of the senses), his desire for pleasures will become extinct. (107)
The dispassionate man who has performed all duties will quickly remove the obstructions to right knowledge and to right faith, and whatever Karman produces obstruction (to righteousness). (108)
Then he knows and sees all things, he is free from delusion and hindrances, his āsravas have gone, and he is proficient in meditation and concentration of thoughts, and being pure he will arrive at beatitude when his life is spent. (109)
He will get rid of all misery which always afflicts mankind; recovered from the long illness, as it were, and glorious, he becomes infinitely happy, and obtains the (final) aim. (110)
We have taught the way how to become exempt from all misery which arises since time without beginning; those beings who follow it will in their time become infinitely happy. (111)
Thus I say.
By beginning less time the Saṃsāra is meant; its causes are the kaṣāyas or cardinal passions, and avirati.
Saccassa = satyasya. This is a various reading; the received text has savvassa. The commentators give the following explanation: by the property of knowledge to make everything knownthis indicates that knowledge is the cause of mōkṣa.
Love and Hatred must of course be understood in their widest meaning. The same remark applies to the term "colour," which according to Hindu terminology denotes everything that is perceived by the eye. The first three sentences are, in the original, dependent on verbs as vadanti, āhus. I have, here and elsewhere, dropped them in the translation.
Rūvāṇugāsāṇuga = rūpa-anuga-āśā-anuga. This division of the compound looks artificial; I should prefer to divide rūva-aṇugāsa-aṇuga = rūpa-anukarṣa-anuga; literally, possessed of attraction by colours.
Instead of "lying," we can also adopt the rendering "stealing," as the word in the original mōsa may stand either for mṛṣā, or for mōṣa.
Aṇissa = aniśra. Niśrā does not occur in common Sanskrit; it is rendered avaṣṭambha by the commentators.
Arati and rati. Compare note on XXI, 21, where I have adopted another translation suited to the context. The first four numbers contain the cardinal passions; the rest the emotions which are called nō-kaṣāya.
My translation follows the interpretation of the commentators. The original runs thus: Kappaṃ na icchijja sahāyalicchū pacchāṇutāvēṇa tavappabhāvaṃ. The meaning they have made out is very unsatisfactory. There is a remarkable various reading in MS. C not noticed by the scholiasts: sahāyalacchiṃ = svabhāvalakṣmīṃ. If this was the original reading, the meaning of the line, in which however I must leave the word kappam untranslated, would come to this: a monk who regrets having taken the vows should not desire personal power as the reward for his penance. Kalpa, according to the commentators, is one who is able to perform his religious duties; a kalpa is contrasted with a śiṣya, novice.
