essay fixer online astronomy homework answers writing essay love joan didion essays online companies that write research proposals freedom writers movie review essay homeworks old saybrook ct digital dissertation australia resume writing services kingston ontario education log

sex movies

سكس عربي

arabic sex movies

سكس

maturetube

سكس xxx

Anekanta : Philosophy of Co-existence: 05.06 The Axioms of Anekānta - The Concomitance of Being and Non-being

Published: 19.07.2010
Updated: 24.07.2010

Chapter 5

The Axioms of Anekānta


The Concomitance of Being and Non-being

The following dialogue between Lord Mahāvīra and his disciple Gautama throws welcome light on the problem.

Gautama:

O Lord! Does being change into being? Does non-being change into non-being?

Lord:

Yes, Gautama! This is exactly so.

Gautama:

O Lord! Does this change of being into being and non-being into non-being take place owing to some effort or occur spontaneously?

Lord:

Gautama! It is effected by effort and also occurs spontaneously.

Gautama:

O Lord! Does your non-being change into non-being exactly in the same way as your being changes into being? Similarly does your being change into being exactly as your non-being changes into non-being?

Lord:

Yes, Gautama! That is exactly so.

The above dialogue clearly defines Lord Mahāvīra's assertion of the concomitance of being and non-being in the same entity as also their distinct causal identities.

Lord Mahāvīra rejected both the propositions, viz. everything exists (sarvam asti) and nothing exists (sarvam nāsti). He proposed a synthesis of the two. Both being and non-being are true. They are distinct, though predicable of the same entity. The distinctness of the two is unambiguously demonstrated in the following words of Gautama addressed to the upholders of heterodox doctrines.

O beloved of Gods, we never speak of being as non-being and non-being as being. We affirm being of the concept 'everything exists' and non-being of the proposition 'nothing exists'. The implication is that being is true as being and non-being is true as non-being. In other words, being and non-being are both real.

It is interesting to note here that it is exactly these two propositions which were advanced by two rival Buddhist schools, viz. the Sarvāstivādins and the Mādhyamika Śūnyavādins. The implication of the above dialogue is the rejection of absolute being and absolute non-being, and acceptance of the synthesis of the two as concrete aspect of any entity. Being and non-being are also explained as possessed of their definite place and value in the above dialogue.

Sources

Anekanta: Philosophy of Co-existence Publisher:  JainVishwa Bharati, Ladnun, Rajasthan, India Editor: Muni Akshay Prakash

Edition:  2010 (1. Edition)

ISBN:  817195140-6

Share this page on:
Page glossary
Some texts contain  footnotes  and  glossary  entries. To distinguish between them, the links have different colors.
  1. Gautama
  2. Mahāvīra
  3. Sarvam Asti
  4. Sarvam Nāsti
Page statistics
This page has been viewed 1080 times.
© 1997-2022 HereNow4U, Version 4.5
Home
About
Contact us
Disclaimer
Social Networking

HN4U Deutsche Version
Today's Counter: